2024
Liu, S., Zhao, W., Shanks, D. R., Hu, X., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2024). Effects of test anxiety on self-testing and learning performance. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 1-38. [PDF][OSF]
Gao, W., Luo, L., Yang, C., & Liu, Z. (2024). Longitudinal associations between metacognition and spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1-23. [PDF]
Zhai, Y., Yang, C., Guo, Y., & Ye, Q. (2024). Impact of cognitive training on metacognitive abilities: a multilevel meta-analysis of interventional efficacy and contributing factors. [PDF]
Tan, Y., Li, T., Yang, C., Huo, X., Liu, M., Zhang, J., & Ma, X. (2024). Route learning in patients with schizophrenia: The role of the forward testing effect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 102305. [PDF]
Li, B., Pastötter, B., Zhong, Y., Su, N., Huang, T., Zhao, W., Hu, X., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2024). Judgments of learning reactively improve memory by enhancing learning engagement and inducing elaborative processing: evidence from an EEG study. Journal of Intelligence, 12, 44. [PDF][OSF]
Zheng, J., Li, B., Zhao, W., Su, N., Fan, T., Yin, Y., Hu, Y., Hu, X., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2024). Soliciting judgments of learning reactively facilitates both recollection- and familiarity-based recognition memory. Metacognition and Learning, 1-25. [PDF][OSF]
Yin, Y., Fan, T., Zhao, W., Hu, X., Su, N., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2024). Study strategy use among elementary school students: Is use of specific study strategies related to academic performance? Metacognition and Learning, 1-18. [PDF]
Li, B., Shanks, D. R., Zhao, W., Hu, X., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2024). Do changed learning goals explain why metamemory judgments reactively affect memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 136, 104506. [PDF][OSF]
2023
Don, H., Yang, C., Boustani, S.,& Shanks, D. R. (2023). Do partial and distributed tests enhance new learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(2), 358-373. [PDF][OSF]
Jiang, L., Yang, C., Pi, Z., Li, Y., Liu, S., & Yi, X. (2023). Individuals with high metacognitive ability are better at divergent and convergent thinking. Journal of Intelligence, 11(8), 162. [PDF]
Li, B., Hu, X., Shanks, D.R., Su, N., Zhao, W., Meng, L., Lei, W., Luo, L. & Yang, C. (2023). Confidence ratings increase response thresholds in decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-10. [PDF][OSF]
Zhao, W., Xu, M., Xu, C., Li, B., Hu, X., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2023). Judgments of learning following retrieval practice produce minimal reactivity effect on learning of education‑related materials. Journal of Intelligence, 11(10), 190. [PDF][OSF]
Yang, C., Li, J., Zhao, W., Luo, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2023). Do practice tests (quizzes) reduce or provoke test anxiety? A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 87. [PDF][OSF]
Yin, Y., Li, B., Hu, X., Guo, X., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2023). The Relationship between dispositional mindfulness and relative accuracy of judgments of learning: the moderating role of test anxiety. Journal of Intelligence, 11(7), 132. [PDF][OSF]
Li, B., Zhao, W., Shi, A., Zhong, Y., Hu, X., Liu, M., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2023). Does the reactivity effect of judgments of learning transfer to learning of new information? Memory, 1-13. [PDF][OSF]
Shanks, D. R., Don, H. J., Boustani, S., & Yang, C. (2023). Test-enhanced learning. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. [PDF]
Yang, C., Shanks, D. R., Zhao, W., Fan, T., & Luo, L. (2023). Frequent quizzing accelerates classroom learning. In C. E. Overson, C. M. Hakala, L. L. Kordonowy, & V. A. Benassi (Eds.), In their own words: What scholars and teachers want you to know about why and how to apply the science of learning in your academic setting (pp. 190-199). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. [PDF]
Zhao, W., Yin, Y., Hu, X., Shanks, D. R., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2023). Memory for inter‑item relations is reactively disrupted by metamemory judgments. Metacognition and Learning, 1-18. [PDF][OSF]
Boustani, S., Owens, C., Don, H. J., Yang, C., & Shanks, D. R. (2023). Evaluating the conceptual strategy change account of test-potentiated new learning in list recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 130, 104412. [PDF][OSF]
Zhao, W., Li, J., Shanks, D.R., Li, B., Hu, X., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2023). Metamemory judgments have dissociable reactivity effects on item and interitem relational memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(4), 557–574. [PDF][OSF]
Yin, Y., Shanks, D.R., Li, B., Fan, T., Hu, X., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2023). The Effects of emotion on judgments of learning and memory: a meta-analytic review. Metacognition and Learning, 1-23. [PDF][OSF]
2022
Shi, A., Xu, C., Zhao, W., Shanks, D.R., Hu, X., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2022). Judgments of learning reactively facilitate visual memory by enhancing learning engagement. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–12. [PDF][OSF]
Don, H. J., Yang, C., Boustani, S., & Shanks, D. R. (2022). Do partial and distributed tests enhance new learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(5), 358. [PDF][OSF]
Yu, X., Chen, Y., Yang, C., Yang, X., Chen, X., & Dang, X. (2022). How does parental involvement matter for children’s academic achievement during school closure in primary school? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 1621–1637. [PDF]
Li, B., Zhao, W., Zheng, J., Hu, X., Su, N., Fan, T., Yin, Y., Liu, M., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2022). Soliciting judgments of forgetting reactively enhances memory as well as making judgments of learning: Empirical and meta-analytic tests. Memory & Cognition, 50(5), 1061–1077. [PDF][OSF]
Hu, X., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2022). Retrospective confidence rating about memory performance is affected by both retrieval fluency and non-decision time. Metacognition and Learning, 1–31. [PDF][OSF]
Hu, X., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2022). Are the Contributions of Processing Experience and Prior Beliefs to Confidence Ratings Domain-general or Domain-specific? [PDF][OSF]
Sun, Y., Shi, A., Zhao, W., Yang, Y., Li, B., Hu, X., Shanks, D.R., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2022). Long‑lasting effects of an instructional intervention on interleaving preference in inductive learning and transfer. Educational Psychology Review, 1–29. [PDF][OSF]
Zhao, W., Li, B., Shanks, D. R., Zhao, W., Zheng, J., Hu, X., Su, N., Fan, T., Yin, Y., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2022). When judging what you know changes what you really know: Soliciting metamemory judgments reactively enhances children’s learning. Child Development, 93(2), 405–417. [PDF][OSF]
Yang, C., Zhao, W., Yuan, B., Luo, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2022). Mind the Gap Between Comprehension and Metacomprehension: Meta-Analysis of Metacomprehension Accuracy and Intervention Effectiveness. Review of Educational Research93(2), 143–194. [PDF][OSF]
Yuan, B., Tolomeo, S., Yang, C., Wang, Y., & Yu, R. (2022). tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 17(1), 26–42. [PDF]
2021
Dang, X., Yang, C., Chen, M., Chen, Y., & Yu, X. (2021). Developmental trajectory of the forward testing effect: The role of reset-of-encoding. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1-16. [PDF]
Fan, T., Zheng, J., Hu, X., Su, N., Yin, Y., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2021). The contribution of metamemory beliefs to the font size effect on judgments of learning: Is word frequency a moderating factor? PLoS One, 16(9), e0257547. [PDF][OSF]
Yang, C., Zhao, W., Luo, L., Sun, B., Potts. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing Potential Mechanisms Underlying Test-Potentiated New Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 48(4), 1127. [PDF][OSF]
Dang. X., Yang, C., & Chen, Y. (2021). Age difference in the forward testing effect: The roles of strategy change and release from proactive interference. Cognitive Development, 59, 101079. [PDF]
Hu, X., Zheng, J., Su, N., Fan, T., Yang, C., Yin, Y., Fleming, S. M., & Luo, L. (2021). A Bayesian inference model for metamemory. Psychological Review, 128(5), 824-855. [PDF][GitHub]
Li, X., Chen, G., & Yang, C. (2021). How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs. Memory & Cognition, 49(5), 912–922. [PDF]
Yang, C., Yu, R., Hu, X., Luo, L., Huang, T., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). How to assess the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs to the formation of judgments of learning: methods and pitfalls. Metacognition and Learning, 16(2), 319–343. [PDF]
Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (Quizzing) Boosts Classroom Learning: A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. [PDF][OSF]
Yuan, B., Yang, C., Sun, X., Yin. J., & Li, W. (2021). How does residential mobility influence generalized trust? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(3), 995-1014. [PDF]
Su, N., Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2021). Levels of Retrieval and the Testing Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 652-670. [PDF]
2020
Wang, Z., Yang, C., Zhao, W., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Perceptual fluency affects judgments of learning non-analytically and analytically through beliefs about how perceptual fluency affects memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 552824. [PDF]
Wang, T., Yang, C., & Zhong, N. (2020). Forward testing effect on new learning in older adults (in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(11), 1-12. [PDF]
Yang, G., Qi, X., Yun, H., & Yang, C. (2020). Why is life special? The animacy effect on memory and its underlying mechanisms (in Chinese). Advances in Psychology, 10, 1274-1285. [PDF]
Lei, W., Chen, J., Yang, C., Guo, Y., Feng, P., Feng, T., & Li, H. (2020). Metacognition-related regions modulate the reactivity effect of confidence ratings on perceptual decision-making. Neuropsychologia, 144, 107502. [PDF]
Hu, X., Zheng, J., Fan, T., Su, N., Yang, C., & Luo, L. (2020). Using multilevel mediation model to measure the contribution of beliefs to judgments of learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 637. [PDF] [OSF]
Yang, C., Sun, B., Potts, R., Yu, R., Luo, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2020). Do working memory capacity and test anxiety modulate the beneficial effects of testing on new learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(4), 724–738. [PDF][OSF]
Rahnev, D., Desender, K., Lee, A. L. F., Adler, W. T., Aguilar-Lleyda, D., Akdoğan, B., … Hu, X., … Luo, L., … & Zylberberg, A. (2020). The confidence database. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 317-325. [PDF] [OSF]
2019
Yang, C., Chew, S., Sun. B., & Shanks, D. R. (2019). The forward effects of testing transfer to different domains of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 809-826. [PDF] [OSF]
Hu, X., Luo, L., & Fleming, S. M. (2019).A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading. Cognition, 193, 104012. [PDF] [GitHub]
2018
Yang, C., Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: A review of the forward testing effect. Nature Partner Journal: Science of Learning, 3, 8. [PDF]
Yang, C., Huang, T., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). Perceptual fluency affects judgments of learning: The font size effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 99-110. [PDF] [OSF]
Nelson, L., O’Donnell, M., … Yang, C., … & Mark, Z. (2018). Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis & Van Knippenberg (1998). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 268-294. [PDF] [OSF]
Yang, C., Sun, B., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 46(3), 384-397. [PDF] [OSF]
Yang, C., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). The forward testing effect: Interim testing enhances inductive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(3), 485-492. [PDF] [OSF]
Su, N., Li, T., Zheng, J., Hu, X., Fan, T., & Luo, L. (2018). How font size affects judgments of learning: Simultaneous mediating effect of item-specific beliefs about fluency and moderating effect of beliefs about font size and memory. PLoS One, 13, e0200888. [PDF]
2017
Yang, C., Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2017). The forward testing effect on self-regulated learning and metamemory monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(3), 273-277. [PDF] [OSF]
Yang, C., Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2017). Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effect on self-regulated learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,43(7), 1073-1092. [PDF] [OSF]
Hu, X., Liu, Z., Chen, W., Zheng, J., Su, N., Wang, W., Lin, C., & Luo, L. (2017). Individual differences in the accuracy of judgments of learning are related to the gray matter volume and functional connectivity of the left mid-insula. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 399. [PDF]
Li, T., Hu, X., Zheng, J., Su, N., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2017). The influence of visual mental imagery size on metamemory accuracy in judgment of learning. Memory, 25, 244-253. [PDF]
2016
Hu, X., Liu, Z., Li, T., & Luo, L. (2016). Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning. Memory, 24, 383-398. [PDF]
Zheng, J., Zhang, W., Li, T., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2016). Practicing more retrieval routes leads to greater memory retention. Acta Psychologica, 169, 109-118. [PDF]
2015
Hu, X., Li, T., Zheng, J., Su, N., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2015). How much do metamemory beliefs contribute to the font-size effect in judgments of learning? PLoS One, 10, e0142351. [PDF]
2011-2014
Zheng, J., Zhang, W., & Luo, L. (2014). Cue Strength Regulating the Testing Effect: The Differences between Different Testing Intervals (in Chinese). Psychological Development and Education, 6, 609-615. [PDF]
Luo, L. & Zhang, W. (2012). Testing for Learning Enhancement: Recent Advances in Memory Psychology and Educational Revelation (in Chinese). Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 1, 43-50. [PDF]
Liu, Z., Luo, L., & Zhang, W. (2011). Retrieval Practice Enhance Learning: Experimental Evidence and Underlying Mechanism (in Chinese). Psychological Development and Education, 4, 441-447. [PDF]
Copyright Notice
Documents provided on this page may be protected by copyright law. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. By downloading the PDF files, you are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author’s copyright. These works may not be reposted, republished, or duplicated without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.